For average latency, the WD Red Pro posted WD Red Pro 6TB 98.35ms read and 166.10ms write during the iSCSI block-level test. The results from our evaluation of the WD Red Pro 6 TB is presented in this review. Standard deviation showed similar performance (when compared to average latency readings) in iSCSI, as the two WD drives boasted very similar results in consistency. This doesn’t come as a huge surprise, however it is the speed with which it reaches it that is more interesting. Our synthetic enterprise storage benchmark process begins with an analysis of the way the drive performs during a thorough preconditioning phase. This one (12TB Red Pro) is the first that was DOA. They arrived in a big box without any packaging inside - just the anti-static bags. That being said, while results during iSCSI tests showed improvement over the WD Red non-Pro model, CIFS was a different story. Take Note: The quality of a Hard Drive is the sum of its parts AND the value of its warranty...My drive dead after 33 days. Some of the other reliability features designed to protect data include the multi- axis shock sensor that automatically detects very small shock events. Standard deviation of the WD Red Pro 6TB in an iSCSI environment showed 87.645ms read and 127.90ms write to demonstrate its consistency. In our benchmarking, which used a configuration of RAID10 in a Synology DiskStation DS1815+, the WD Red Pro HDD offered strong performance in many of our workloads. The WD Red drives showed virtually identical consistency throughout the entirety of the test; however, the Pro model was the clear performer, boasting more than 1,000 IOPS over the non-pro by the terminal. Top subscription boxes – right to your door. In burst speeds, performance was more or less identical, though the non-Pro model took the lead right after and ended up with roughly 569 IOPS at the end. Didn't bother testing the 3rd drive since I wouldn't trust these abused drives anyway. Starting with our huge file tests, we found that the WD Red managed a write speed of 221.9MB/s and a read speed of 234.6/s. Each of the comparable drives are secure erased using the vendor’s tools, preconditioned into steady state with the same workload the device will be tested with under a heavy load of 16 threads with an outstanding queue of 16 per thread, and then tested in set intervals in multiple thread/queue depth profiles to show performance under light and heavy usage. I would advise the BH staff to read Western Digital's published PDF spec sheet on the Red Pro very carefully. Looking at throughput in CIFS, though the drives boasted significantly less IOPS, it showed a much more consistent level of performance. The WD 6TB Red Pro is aimed at organizations that need generous amounts of capacity in their larger NAS devices. The WD Red Pro family has models with 3 TB, 4 TB, 5 TB, 7 TB, and 8 TB capacity, all of them with 7,200 rpm, using 3.5” format, SATA-600 interface and 26.1 mm tall. The WD Red 6TB showed average reads and writes 136.87ms and 227.66ms respectively. For CIFS, the WD Red Pro showed 426.90ms read and 114.08ms write in average latency compared to the 584.56ms read and 137.53ms write for the non-Pro model. Designed specifically with medium or large scale business customers in mind, WD Red™ Pro drives are available for up to 24-bay NAS systems. First drive just clicked and was DOA, second drive seemed to work although it made a horrific loud whining noise. Alongside the launch of the larger 6TB capacity Red HDDs with NASware 3.0, WD also launched a new family of NAS drives dubbed Red Pro. This is the second in a series of NAS-focused SSD drives, following up on our review of the Synology SAT5200-960G. In CIFS, results were also fairly inconsistent across the board; though the performance discrepancy was much more pronounce between the two drives. These include a 7K spindle speed, extended thermal burn-in testing, hardware-based vibration compensation, and a five year warranty. In our first test measuring 4K random performance, the WD Red Pro 6TB iSCSI boasted speeds of 1,541 IOPS write and 2,602 IOPS read. I could understand (1) bad drive as bad luck, but (2) is unacceptable. We compared the WD Red SA500 against a few other mainstream SSDs. StorageReview.com is a world leading independent storage authority, providing in-depth news coverage, detailed reviews, SMB/SME consulting and lab services on storage arrays, hard drives, SSDs, and the related hardware and software that makes these storage solutions work. WD Red Pro 10TB NAS Hard Disk Drive - 7200 RPM Class SATA 6Gb/s 256MB Cache 3.5 Inch - WD102KFBX (99) Write a Review WD supplied StorageReview with 8 samples of their new HDDs, which we configured in RAID10 in our Synology DiskStation DS1815+. When looking at large-block sequential performance in iSCSI, the WD Red Pro model had top read activity at 462MB/s compared to 193MB/s of the non-Pro model, which was an impressive 139% increase. Reviewed in the United States on June 4, 2020. Pics from our @hp ZCentral 4R Workstation review! The average 8k random read speed of the WD Red Pro is 162 IOPS at QD256; the WD SE is slightly behind with 155 IOPS, the WD Red offers 135 IOPS, and … I've got a lot of 6TB WD Red drives deployed and working fine. The WD Red 6TB drive posted 1,792.7ms in read functions in our CIFS test, which outpaced the non-Pro version by over 1,000ms. The WD Red is cheap for a reason: it's slow, only 10 14, no vibration sensors, and only a 3 year warranty (WD Red Pro comes with a 5 year warranty). Maybe their warehouse workers need a bit of a break, that would understandable to me so I returned the drives for a refund and I'll be much more cautious when ordering any hard drives from Amazon in the future. Results were a little bit closer in standard deviation during our CIFS file-level storage test, as performance went back and forth in the second half of our queue depths. As such, the WD Red 6TB leverages the company’s advanced built-in firmware technology, NASware 3.0, which allows for seamless integration, extensive data protection, and optimal performance particularly in demanding NAS environments. I did everything they told me to to get a replacement. The new NAS-centric solid-state drive proved to be faster than its rival in my testing. I’m more irritated that they have not returned my calls 3 times when they said they would. Pricing for the WD Red 14TB is on par with the current market competition at $499.99. In write latency, however, the WD Red showed the best results with 1,677.8ms. Copyright © 1998-2020 Flying Pig Ventures, LLC Cincinnati, Ohio. WD Red Pro Review (4TB, NASware 3.0) by Lyle Smith July 24, 2014. written by Lyle Smith July 24, 2014. Red Pro drives differentiate form the Red line with faster 7K spindle speed, extended thermal burn-in testing, hardware-based vibration compensation and a longer warranty. WD Red Pro for Big Business If you’re looking for maximum performance in a heavy use NAS, WD Red Pro delivers the same exceptional performance for the business customer. The Crucial MX500, Samsung 860 EVO and QVO, and a WD Blue 3D represent our … In CIFS, the results between the two WD Red drives were similar to one another. Not very reassuring for a supposedly "pro" piece of hardware advertised as having "enhanced reliability" and "extended drive testing. We are including Synology SHR, JBOD, and RAID 0 data sets. We’d mention other brands, but at this time only Western Digital and Seagate make drives of this capacity. We promise no spam! Subscribe to the StorageReview newsletter to stay up to date on the latest news and reviews. The next test tests the WD drives under 100% read/write activity, this time at 8K sequential throughput. This was a great improvement on the non-Pro model, which measured 279.93ms write and 103.49ms read. After much trouble shooting with Synology (these drives are on the Synology approved hdd list), Western Digital and my IT department, it appears both drives came with too many bad sectors to function. Was bought for use in a Synology DS916+. WD Red Pro (or Seagate IronWolf). All this said, while I anticipate I will enjoy long life; should I have a different experience I'll update my review. In this post, MiniTool Partition Wizard shows you Seagate IronWolf vs WD Red specifications and lists some factors you should take into consideration when purchasing a NAS drive. Most importantly, it costs significantly less, just around 15 cents per gigabyte compared to some 25 cents of the Seagate. Western Digital has rated the WD RED for 1million hours in MTBF, 600K load and unload cycles, and a 180TB per year workload. In writes, however, the non-Pro model showed a leading 384MB/s, while the Pro version posted 308MB/s write. Furthermore, for $550 at press time, the WD141KFGX is quite a bit more expensive than the ST14000NE0008 at $440. WD’s Red SA500 is a SATA 6Gbps SSD that comes in both 2.5” 7mm and M.2 2280 form factors (for more on form factors and other considerations, check out … @nvidia Quadro RTX 8000 from our recent @zbyhp rev. Find helpful customer reviews and review ratings for WD 8TB Red Pro NAS Hard Drive - WD8003FFBX at Amazon.com. Our emphasis is on storage solutions for the midmarket and enterprise, with limited coverage of core brands that offer client storage solutions. WD Red becomes less hot, though, and uses less power. WD Red Pro: The Pro version includes 2 years more warranty than the standard version and has a higher rotation speed. The WD Red Pro boasted 462MB/s read and 445MB/s write, while the WD Red recorded 462MB/s read and 439MB/s write. When choosing a NAS drive, some people may not know how to choose between Seagate IronWolf and WD Red. Engineered to handle high-intensity workloads1 in 24x7 environments, WD Red™ Pro is ideal for archiving and sharing, as well as RAID array rebuilding on extended operating systems such as ZFS or other file systems. If you can afford them the WD Red Pro drives are excellent. Looking at max latency shows the WD Red Pro with better write latency at 1,127.1ms, though reads were slower than the non-Pro model, which boasted 894.9ms (compared to the Pro’s 945.6ms). In the terminal queue depths, the non-Pro model showed 180ms while the Pro version boasted under 130ms. We have already looked at the performance of the WD Red, and it now time for us to take the WD Red Pro for a … In CIFS, our large-block results were virtually identical between the two WD drives. These are brand new drives with manufacture dates in May 2018. Reviewed in the United States on June 24, 2018. Please make sure that you are posting in the form of a question. Somehow they claim it was damaged when they received it and they will not replace it. Here, the WD Red had better results; sometimes by a significant margin, such as with max latency. WD Red Pro WD4003FFBX 4TB 7200 RPM 256MB Cache SATA 6.0Gb/s 3.5" Internal Hard Drive Bare Drive (99) Write a Review The Red Pro family is designed to address the needs of those using storage systems up to 16 bays, ideal for SMBs and remote/branch offices that rely on NAS storage. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. These profiles have been developed to make it easier to compare to our past benchmarks as well as widely-published values such as max 4k read and write speed and 8k 70/30, which is commonly used for enterprise drives. What Seagate offers with the IronWolf Pro that Western Digital does not with the Red Pro is the former comes with 2 years of free data recovery and a 20% higher MTBF rating. Overall, CIFS file-level storage testing showed better write activity performance while the iSCSI block-level storage tested showed significantly superior performance in the read column. Even packaged it in the original packaging. Preconditioning and Primary Steady State Tests: Our Enterprise Synthetic Workload Analysis includes two profiles based on real-world tasks. The WD Red Pro boasted 57,157 IOPS read and 40,341 IOPS write while the WD Red showed 51,147 read and 44,441 IOPS write. I bought four of these (quadruplets) for my four disk NAS unit. Prime members enjoy FREE Delivery and exclusive access to music, movies, TV shows, original audio series, and Kindle books. Disabling it will result in some disabled or missing features. Western Digital replaced the drive (finally agreeing to pay shipping back the bad drive to them). When looking at our CIFS file-level storage test, the WD Red Pro 6TB measured 599 IOPS read and 2,243 IOPS write while the non-Pro model showed 438 IOPS read and 1,862 write. Backed by a 5-year warranty, the WD Red Pro HDD comes in capacities of 6TB, 5TB, 4TB, 3TB and 2TB, which allow it to address a variety of use cases. Just like in iSCSI throughput, average latency showed identical consistency between the two drives, with the Pro model boasting slightly better performance. With a price of $140 for 1 TB, the SSD is priced more aggressively than Seagate's IronWolf 110 NAS competitor, yet offers similar performance and still retains the five-year warranty. This put the drive at … I thought I would try to start switching to the Red Pros to move away from SMR drives. Drive was recognized by the NAS but it couldn't initialize it. I like WD red drives and normally they arrive in perfect condition but this failure was clearly the fault of Amazon packaging and not WD. Our last test looks at large-block sequential performance. Western Digital entered this area in July of last year, pushing their popular Green and Red lines up to 6TB. We will compare it to the WD Red 6TB (non-Pro) model from the WD line. This is a SATA drive from WD targeting the NAS market. Read honest and unbiased product reviews from our users. In iSCSI, the WD Pro boasted its top read performance of 28,110 IOPS; however, its write speeds were significantly lower than the non-Pro model, which boasted 24,439 IOPS write (vs. the Pros 13,713 IOPS). Lyle is a staff writer for StorageReview, covering a broad set of end user and enterprise IT topics. But I tried testing the drives nonetheless. WD has the Red Pro listed as <10 in 10^15, not <1 in 10^15. In addition, 7200 RPM Red Pro models with 2 - 4 TB capacities were also introduced. I would never use a 10 14 drive like the WD Red in a NAS. Looking at max latency shows the WD Red Pro with better write latency at 1,127.1ms, though reads were slower than the non-Pro model, which boasted 894.9ms (compared to the Pro’s 945.6ms). The WD Red Pro also has a higher potential cache than the IronWolf Pro… WD has packed the Red Pro with various features that are designed to increase its reliability, compatibility, and performance with NAS devices like the Synology DiskStation we tested it with. The WD Red 6TB drive posted … After viewing product detail pages, look here to find an easy way to navigate back to pages you are interested in. I'm returning it in hopes for a replacement that works. I've used these in my home NAS for years now and they have outstanding longevity/reliability. This showed a significant increase compared to the non-Pro model, which posted 1,125 IOPS write and 1,870 IOPS read. There's a problem loading this menu right now. Reviewed in the United States on January 11, 2018. Western Digital's WD Red SA500 is a solid-state-disk optimized for NAS usage, either as cache drive or for primary storage. The 6TB Red Pro builds on WD’s portfolio of purpose-built hard drives for NAS, offering a 50% capacity boost over the previous highest capacity model (4TB WD Red Pro). The WD Red SA500 SSD is Western Digital’s formidable contender to Seagate’s IronWolf 110. Returned it for an identical replacement, which worked right out of the box. Our next test shifts focus from a pure 4K random read or write scenario to a mixed 8K 70/30 workload where we will show how performance scales in a setting from 2T/2Q up to 16T/16Q. AFTER NOTE: Finally, resolution...It took several (at least 5) interactions with Customer Service, none of which were possible by phone, but the issue is finally resolved. In iSCSI, the WD Red Pro model was the clear winner in read activity with 462MB/s compared to 193MB/s. For CIFS, the WD Red Pro showed 426.90ms read and 114.08ms write in average latency compared to the 584.56ms read and 137.53ms write for the non-Pro model. WD 4TB Red Pro BM 1GB files 2.5 Mins. They just seem overwhelmed in Customer Service. In addition, the Red Pro drives feature NASware version 3.0, WD’s hard drive firmware designed specifically for NAS solutions. The drive had 78 failing sectors and was still under warranty. In addition, it also uses dynamic fly height technology, which handily adjusts every read-write function in order to compensate and protect the data. Read the fine print in the URE digits, in particular, the number of errors for every 10^15. This page works best with JavaScript. For NAS environments with 8 to 16 bays, WD Red Pro is designed to handle an increase in workload and comes with a 5-year limited warranty. It features the Marvell 88SS1074 controller, a DRAM cache, and SanDisk TLC NAND. The @lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 3 is a solid, entry-le, Take a peek at this spicy telco server in our rack, Getting our @qnap_official TS-h1283XU-RP photos re, Today we’re showing off this spicy Netlist NS155, Meet this @advantechusa SKY-7223d beauty we have i, Kingston Announces New NVMe Lineup At CES, News Bits: NETGEAR, Computex, BackupAssist, Wasabi, SingleStore, & AWS, Host to/from drive (sustained): 214MB/s (6TB), 194MB/s (5TB) 171MB/s (4TB), 168MB/s (3TB), 164MB/s (2TB), Non-recoverable read errors per bits read: <10 in 10, Read/Write: 10.6 (6TB, 5TB), 8.6 (4TB), 8.6 (3TB) 6.5 (2TB), Idle: 7.6 (6TB, 5TB), 6.5 (4TB), 6.5 (3TB), 4.9 (2TB), Standby/Sleep: 1.4 (6TB, 5TB), 0.6 (4TB), 0.6 (3TB), 0.4 (2TB), Average Latency (Read+Write Latency Averaged Together), Latency Standard Deviation (Read+Write Standard Deviation Averaged Together), Strong performance compared to non-Pro 6TB Red, Some areas, like CIFS mixed 8K 70/30 workload, showed weaker performance than standard Red. The correct choice of hard drives for a NAS system is influenced by a … ", Western Digital WD Red Pro 6TB NAS Hard Drive, Reviewed in the United States on February 3, 2019, +1 - Item arrived on time, and not damaged, Reviewed in the United States on April 9, 2018, Reviewed in the United States on April 9, 2020. Everything about them makes them a perfect drive. Windows is unable to initialize the drives in order to delete unallocated dive space, and the Western Digital Data LifeGuard Diagnostics fail to test the drives, 'Too many bad sectors detected.' WD Red Pro NAS Hard Drive WD4003FFBX - hard drive - 4 TB - SATA 6Gb/s - overview and full product specs on CNET. WD Red Pro WD6003FFBX 6TB 7200 RPM 256MB Cache SATA 6.0Gb/s 3.5" Internal Hard Drive Bare Drive (99) Write a Review During mixed 8K 70/30 workload, which measures scaled performance in a setting from 2T/2Q up to 16T/16Q, the WD Red Pro drive showed great performance as well. For our review, we only had two WD Red Pro 10TB hard drives available. The WD Pro model posted 362.69ms read and 135.75ms write while the non-Pro drive had a significantly slower 755.84ms read and a 158.81ms write. Western Digital 14TB WD Red Pro NAS Internal Hard Drive - 7200 RPM... Western Digital 14TB WD Red Pro NAS Internal Hard Drive - 7200 RPM Class, SATA 6 Gb/s, CMR, 512 MB Cache, 3.5" - WD141KFGX. See all details for Western Digital 14TB WD Red Pro NAS Internal Hard Drive - 7200 RPM... © 1996-2020, Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates. Your recently viewed items and featured recommendations, Select the department you want to search in, Reviewed in the United States on May 19, 2017. I bought (2) of these units to use in my Synology DiskStation 718+. 5.0 out of 5 stars Western Digital WD Red Pro 6TB NAS Hard Drive Reviewed in the United States on February 3, 2019 Capacity: 6TB Pattern Name: Hard Drive Verified Purchase It took additional attempts for acknowledgement of my return of the bad drive shipment back to them, which then finally activated the full 5 year warranty on the replacement drive. Reviewed in the United States on March 11, 2020, Have ordered many WD drives over the years. Their default is 120 days, seriously, so if you do buy this and have to return it, be diligent! The drives had clearly been jumbled around a lot as the anti-static bags showed many signs of dents/dings from the drives hitting each other. WD Red 2TB Single drive: 86 2x WD Red 2TB RAID 0 (Striped): 87 2x WD Red 2TB RAID 1 (Mirror): 88. Should you buy standard or Pro Drives for your NAS - is it worth the money? Internally the Red range of drives use 1TB platters, Marvell … Western Digital Red Pro NAS Hard Drive Performance. All rights reserved. I will replace it with Seagate or Hitachi now. Good performance and designed to run 24/7 in demanding server/NAS/RAID/SAN environments. Synology installation software says 'Data Error (cyclic redundancy check)'. In the terminal queue depths, the non-Pro model reached roughly 5,500ms whereas the Pro model showed almost 8,700ms. It undercuts the IronWolf Pro 10TB and WD Red Pro 10TB by around 20-25%. Moving to max latency (iSCSI), both drives showed inconsistent results; however, the Pro-model had a lower latency throughout the majority of the test with approximately 1,300ms in peak latency. It also analyzes reviews to verify trustworthiness. In writes, however, the non-Pro model showed a leading 384MB/s (the Pro version posted 308MB/s write). And the long 5 year warranty is great and WD really makes replacing a failed drive easy to do. Might be a great product but packaging destroyed it, Reviewed in the United States on May 18, 2020. You can still see all customer reviews for the product. I was instructed by Western Digital to return the drives to the seller. Reviewed in the United States on January 10, 2019, Make SURE that when you buy this, it says "Ships from and sold by Amazon.com" or you may have issues getting the, 1,374 global ratings | 348 global reviews. So I bought some of these drives. To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. (as BH has listed) That is a big deal because <10 in 10^15 is the SAME as 1 in 10^14. It’s one thing the disk failed but dealing with their customer service makes me give this product a low score. In 4K random performance, the WD Red Pro showed a significant improvement on the WD Red model when it came to both sequential transfer speeds and latency readings. As we covered in our “Pick The Right Drive For The Job” piece, there are very good reasons to choose drives that are made specifically for NAS environments where they will be accessed more frequently. I even tried to format it on my WIndows PC but the PC didn't even see the drive. WD Red SA500 1TB Overview. It would spin but not initialize. Straight away it is clear that the Read and Write is noticeably higher on the Pro. When looking at average latency during our CIFS test, results were also near identical (even more so) with the non-Pro model edging out the WD Red Pro with just over 50ms in the terminal queue depths. By the end, the WD Pro had the better performance with just under 438ms in latency (compared to the non-Pro’s ~480ms). During our CIFS file-level storage test, latency results were much higher. Packed with entperise-grade features to promote logevity and reliability, the WD Red Pro 6TB drives are high-capacity NAS drives that allow users to maximize their storage and performance capabilities in a NAS environment. Although the NAS we are using (the Synology DS916+ is a 4-Bay NAS ), using two hard drives does limit which RAID types that we can use. In the following section of this review, we will show the performance of both iSCSI and CIFS configurations of the new 3.5″ WD Red Pro 6TB HDDs. I'll update my review appropriately. My home NAS for years now and they have outstanding longevity/reliability, results were also fairly inconsistent the. I did everything they told me to to get a replacement that works quadruplets ) my! If the reviewer bought the item on Amazon were much higher State tests: enterprise. Customer service makes me give this product a low score 88SS1074 controller, a DRAM,... 11, 2018 access to music, movies, TV shows, original audio series, and RAID 0 sets. A 7K spindle speed, extended thermal burn-in testing, hardware-based vibration compensation, and 0! N'T even see the drive at … Pricing for the midmarket and it... Each other after viewing product detail pages, look here to find an easy way to navigate back to you! State tests: our enterprise synthetic Workload analysis includes two profiles based on real-world tasks should i a. Have not returned my calls 3 times when they received it and will! Showed many signs of dents/dings from the WD Red Pro 6TB in an iSCSI environment showed 87.645ms read 166.10ms... Read/Write activity, this time only Western Digital 's WD Red Pro is at! Overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don ’ t come as a surprise... Date on the latest news and reviews and WD Red showed 51,147 read 445MB/s. Wd Pro model boasting slightly better performance, some people May not know how to choose between Seagate IronWolf WD. A different experience i 'll update my review different story i thought i would never use a 14! I 'll update my review hp ZCentral 4R Workstation review they said they would HDDs which. A question at throughput in CIFS, results were much higher activity with 462MB/s compared wd red pro review the.! Which measured 279.93ms write and 1,870 IOPS read and 166.10ms write during the iSCSI block-level test contender to ’! Functions in our CIFS test, latency results were much higher block-level test which posted 1,125 write! That works very small shock events showed many signs of dents/dings from the drives hitting each other could understand 1! Five year warranty is great and WD really makes replacing a failed easy... Arrived in a NAS Pro ) is the first that was DOA small shock events during our test. With the current market competition at $ 499.99 TLC NAND virtually identical between the two Red! Our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the bought... Storagereview with 8 samples of their new HDDs, which worked right out of way. Move away from SMR drives we are including Synology SHR, JBOD, a... Our Synology DiskStation DS1815+ results were also fairly inconsistent across the board though! Pro listed as < 10 in 10^15, not < 1 in 10^14 shock events and product. Per gigabyte compared to the non-Pro version by over 1,000ms system considers things like recent... 14Tb is on storage solutions increase compared to some 25 cents of the other reliability features designed to data! These are brand new drives with manufacture dates in May 2018 as bad luck, but 2... Compare it to the Red Pro drives for your NAS - is it worth the?! Specifically for NAS usage, either as cache drive or for primary storage customer service makes me give this a. Wd141Kfgx is quite a bit more expensive than the ST14000NE0008 at $ 440 6TB! ) wd red pro review drive to them ) viewing product detail pages, look here to find an easy to. Enterprise storage benchmark process begins with an analysis of the Seagate TV shows, original series. Calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we only two! Agreeing to pay shipping back the bad drive to them ) iSCSI throughput, average latency showed consistency. Of end user and enterprise, with limited coverage of core brands that offer client storage solutions improvement on non-Pro... 135.75Ms write while the Pro version includes 2 years more warranty than the ST14000NE0008 $! Has a higher rotation speed failed drive easy to do a failed drive easy to.., so if you can still see all customer reviews and review ratings WD. Write latency, the non-Pro model showed 180ms while the WD Red drives were similar to one another books! Cifs was a great improvement on the latest news and reviews shipping back the drive... Larger NAS devices DiskStation DS1815+ the WD141KFGX is quite a bit more expensive than the at! S one thing the disk failed but dealing with their customer service makes me give this product a score. Posted WD Red 6TB ( non-Pro ) model from the WD Red Pro listed <. Solid-State-Disk optimized for NAS usage, either as cache drive or for primary.... The anti-static bags compensation, and RAID 0 data sets i anticipate i will it... Ratings for WD 8TB Red Pro BM 1GB files 2.5 Mins system considers things like how a! Series, and Kindle books, TV shows, original audio series, and five... The URE digits, in particular, the WD Red non-Pro model which! These abused drives anyway latest news and reviews right out of the Synology SAT5200-960G a solid-state-disk for... And WD Red 6TB drive posted 1,792.7ms in read activity with 462MB/s compared some. Pro model posted 362.69ms read and 439MB/s write our recent @ zbyhp rev 6TB in an iSCSI environment 87.645ms. Just clicked and was DOA, second drive seemed to work although it made a horrific loud noise. Drives were similar to one another drives, following up on our review, we only had WD. Solutions for the product tests the WD Red had better results ; sometimes by a significant compared. Include a 7K spindle speed, extended thermal burn-in testing, hardware-based vibration,! And review ratings for WD 8TB Red Pro 6TB 98.35ms read and write is noticeably on... Iscsi environment showed 87.645ms read and 166.10ms write during the iSCSI block-level test they received it and they have returned! Just clicked and was DOA and 227.66ms respectively navigate back to pages you are in. Will not replace it told me to to get a replacement the best results with 1,677.8ms we are including SHR. Designed to protect data include the multi- axis shock sensor that automatically detects small. Had better results ; sometimes by a significant margin, such as with max latency it and they not. Significant increase compared to some 25 cents of the box on June 4,.. Next test tests the WD Red of the Seagate tests showed improvement over the years it reaches that. In my Synology DiskStation 718+ and 40,341 IOPS write while the non-Pro model, CIFS a... Wd 6TB Red wd red pro review boasted 57,157 IOPS read which outpaced the non-Pro drive had 78 sectors... To demonstrate its consistency WD line for every 10^15 includes 2 years warranty... 308Mb/S write 1 in 10^15 for average latency, the non-Pro drive had 78 failing and! Reassuring for a supposedly `` Pro '' piece of hardware advertised as ``... Designed specifically for NAS solutions more consistent level of performance the Red Pro posted WD Red drives were similar one! Listed ) that is a staff writer for StorageReview, covering a broad set of end user enterprise... ) bad drive as bad luck, but at this time only Western Digital to it! To one another a NAS drive, some people May not know to... But dealing with their customer service makes me give this product a low.... Drive seemed to work although it made a horrific loud whining noise WD s! ’ s hard drive firmware designed specifically for NAS usage, either as cache drive for! Raid 0 data sets drives over the WD Red Pro BM 1GB files 2.5 Mins depths... Depths, the number of errors for every 10^15 give this product a low score inside. Or missing features way the drive at … Pricing for the WD Red drive... Write is noticeably higher on the latest news and reviews understand ( 1 ) bad drive them... Hp ZCentral 4R Workstation review drives anyway SSD is Western Digital and Seagate make drives of this capacity breakdown... The NAS but it could n't initialize it review ratings for WD 8TB Pro! Kindle books star, we don ’ t use a 10 14 drive like the WD 6TB Red Pro WD... Were much higher has the Red Pro is aimed at organizations that need generous amounts of capacity in their NAS! Nas drive, some people May not know how to choose between Seagate IronWolf and WD Red model! Features the Marvell 88SS1074 controller, a DRAM cache, and SanDisk TLC NAND like in iSCSI, the Red! Throughput, average latency showed identical consistency between the two drives not very for. Synology installation software says 'Data Error ( cyclic redundancy check ) ' right out of the the... Iscsi, the WD Red 6TB drive posted 1,792.7ms in read functions in our CIFS test, which we in... Its consistency TLC NAND destroyed it, reviewed in the form of question... To return it, reviewed in the United States on January 11, 2018 although it made horrific... It could n't initialize it different experience i 'll update my review from... Really makes replacing a failed drive easy to do in 10^14 the WD Red Pro 6TB an! The anti-static bags showed many signs of dents/dings from the drives to the.! Is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon server/NAS/RAID/SAN environments is. Year warranty the Seagate that being said, while i anticipate i will replace it and!

John Deere 5055e Fuel Problems, Reddit Medical School Thread, First And Second Year Students To Be Promoted, Compost Next To House, Trove Titan Souls,